Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo

UPDC

  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "ไกรวิชญ์ ชินายศ"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    กลยุทธ์วาทศิลป์และการโน้มน้าวทางการเมือง: การวิเคราะห์คำเชื่อมความของพิธา ลิ้มเจริญรัตน์ ในการปราศรัยช่วงก่อนเลือกตั้งปี 2566 ในประเทศไทย
    (มหาวิทยาลัยพะเยา, 2024) ไกรวิชญ์ ชินายศ
    The objectives of this independent study were: 1) to investigate the types of discourse markers (DMs) utilized in Pita Limcharoenrat 2) to analyze the frequencies of discourse markers used, and 3) to explore the intended meanings in four pre-election speeches. Purposive sampling was chosen for the analysis base on 21 types of discourse markers, theoretical framework of Swan (2005). The findings of the study were displayed as follows; 1) 14 of 21 types of discourse markers were utilized by Pita Limcharoenrat's speeches of four election campaigns. 2) The study founded DMs were less employed in shorter speeches than the longer. DMs Concession and Counter Argument had the highest frequency, appearing 19 times, followed by Adding and Logical Consequence which appeared 16 and 14 times, respectively. On the other hand, some categories of DMs, including Similarity, Contradicting, Generalizing, Giving Examples and Persuading were not utilized. 3) The intended meaning of discourse markers was employed to range the structure of contents, contrast and emphasize the ideas, and concede and counter-arguing classified by Swan (2005)

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback